United States v. Larry Goodall

479 F. App'x 142
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 19, 2012
Docket11-10597
StatusUnpublished

This text of 479 F. App'x 142 (United States v. Larry Goodall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Larry Goodall, 479 F. App'x 142 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

*143 MEMORANDUM ***

Appellant Larry Goodall (“Goodall”) appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty'to one count of transportation of a minor for prostitution under 18 U.S.C. § 2421. The facts of this case are known to the parties. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d)(2)(B), permits withdrawal if the defendant “can show a fair and just reason” for his request. Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(d)(2)(B). “We review the denial of a motion to withdraw a plea for abuse of discretion.” United States v. Mayweather, 634 F.3d 498, 504 (9th Cir.2010).

Goodall has not demonstrated a “fair and just reason” for withdrawal. There is extensive evidence in the record demonstrating Goodall’s guilt, and Goodall received a substantially shorter sentence than he would have had he been convicted of the three other charges that the government dropped under the terms of the plea agreement.

AFFIRMED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mayweather
634 F.3d 498 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 F. App'x 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-larry-goodall-ca9-2012.