United States v. Larry Eugene Gresham
This text of 38 F.3d 1219 (United States v. Larry Eugene Gresham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
38 F.3d 1219
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Larry Eugene GRESHAM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-30446.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 17, 1994.*
Decided Oct. 21, 1994.
Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Larry Eugene Gresham appeals his conviction and sentence of 168 months, imposed following his plea of guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841(a)(1), 846.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gresham's counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 F.3d 1219, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36918, 1994 WL 579512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-larry-eugene-gresham-ca9-1994.