United States v. Larry Deffenbaugh

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Larry Deffenbaugh. Read the opinion of the Court — 709 F.3d 266
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2016·No. 15-7498·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7498

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LARRY L. DEFFENBAUGH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:10-cr-00049-HCM-TEM-1)

Submitted: December 22, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry L. Deffenbaugh, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Deffenbaugh appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on several postjudgment motions filed in his

criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Deffenbaugh, No. 2:10-

cr-00049-HCM-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 21, 2015 & entered July

22, 2015; Sept. 8, 2015; Sept. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Larry Deffenbaugh, (4th Cir. 2016).

United States v. Larry Deffenbaugh (United States v. Larry Deffenbaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.