United States v. Larry Copeland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6573
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LARRY MICHAEL COPELAND,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00082-MR-2)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Michael Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Larry Michael Copeland appeals the district court’s order
denying his fourth motion for transcripts at Government expense.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Copeland, No. 1:08-cr-00082-MR-2
(W.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Larry Copeland (United States v. Larry Copeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.