United States v. Larry Copeland

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Larry Copeland. Read the opinion of the Court — 707 F.3d 522
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2015·No. 15-6573·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6573

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LARRY MICHAEL COPELAND,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00082-MR-2)

Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Michael Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Michael Copeland appeals the district court’s order

denying his fourth motion for transcripts at Government expense.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Copeland, No. 1:08-cr-00082-MR-2

(W.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Larry Copeland, (4th Cir. 2015).

United States v. Larry Copeland (United States v. Larry Copeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.