United States v. Lanz
This text of 96 F. App'x 491 (United States v. Lanz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Cenobio Herrera Lanz appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 33-month sentence for wire fraud and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Lanz has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and-a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Lanz has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
Lanz’s motion for extension of time to file a supplemental brief is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 F. App'x 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lanz-ca9-2004.