United States v. Lantis Young

585 F. App'x 182
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 14, 2014
Docket14-6932
StatusUnpublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 182 (United States v. Lantis Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lantis Young, 585 F. App'x 182 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lantis Jetón Young seeks to appeal his life sentence imposed in 2003. At the time Young’s judgment of conviction was entered on the docket, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure required a defendant in a criminal case to file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(l)(A)(i). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered judgment on September 3, 2003. Young filed his notice of appeal, at the earliest, June 10, 2014. Because Young failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jose v. Reyes
759 F.2d 351 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
585 F. App'x 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lantis-young-ca4-2014.