United States v. Lankford

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lankford. Read the opinion of the Court — 196 F.3d 563
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 16, 1999·No. 98-11347·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11347 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM KESTER LANKFORD,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:98-CR-020(01) ---------------------

June 15, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for William Kester Lankford moves to

withdraw as appellate counsel and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lankford has not

responded to this motion. Our independent review of the brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lankford, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Lankford (United States v. Lankford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)