United States v. Langston

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Langston

22 C.M.A. 372

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedJune 22, 1973

DocketNo. 26,667; No. 26,669; No. 26,724; No. 26,798

StatusPublished

This text of 22 C.M.A. 372 (United States v. Langston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Langston, 22 C.M.A. 372 (cma 1973).

Pincite

Opinions

[373]*373OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

The question presented for review in each of these cases is whether evidence of a previous Article 15 disciplinary proceeding at which correctional custody was imposed was inadmissible because the accused was unrepresented by appointed counsel at the proceeding. In United States v Shamel, 22 USCMA —, — CMR — (June 22, 1973), decided this date, we sustained the admissibility of the evidence. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review in each case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[373]*373OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

The question presented for review in each of these cases is whether evidence of a previous Article 15 disciplinary proceeding at which correctional custody was imposed was inadmissible because the accused was unrepresented by appointed counsel at the proceeding. In United States v Shamel, 22 USCMA —, — CMR — (June 22, 1973), decided this date, we sustained the admissibility of the evidence. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review in each case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 C.M.A. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-langston-cma-1973.