United States v. Langhorne Carter Rorer and Francis A. Simpson, Jr.
This text of 337 F.2d 784 (United States v. Langhorne Carter Rorer and Francis A. Simpson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Langhorne Carter RORER and Francis A. Simpson, Jr., Appellants.
No. 9496.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued October 7, 1964.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Certiorari Denied February 1, 1965.
See 85 S.Ct. 717, 721.
James Heinz, Manassas, Va., for appellant Simpson.
James P. Davenport, Washington, D. C., for both appellants.
John A. K. Donovan, Falls Church, Va. (Donovan, Turnbull & Brophy, Falls Church, Va., on brief), for appellant Rorer.
Plato Cacheris, Asst. U. S. Atty. (C. V. Spratley, Jr., U. S. Atty., and Edward T. Joyce, Atty., Dept. of Justice, on brief), for appellee.
Before BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and GORDON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
As the record discloses to us no error of substance in the trial, and evidence adequate to sustain the verdict, we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
337 F.2d 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-langhorne-carter-rorer-and-francis-ca4-1965.