United States v. LANE
This text of United States v. LANE (United States v. LANE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Andrew S. LANE Aviation Structural Mechanic Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202100104
Decided: 18 October 2021
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Donald R. Ostrom
Sentence adjudged 19 January 2021 by a general court-martial con- vened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for four months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Captain Thomas P. Belsky, JAGC, USNR
For Appellee: Commander Joshua M. Hawkes, JAGC, USN Commander James M. Toohey, JAGC, USN Lieutenant Commander Jeffrey S. Marden, JAGC, USN United States v. Lane, NMCCA No. 202100104 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: Appellant was convicted in accordance with his pleas of two specifications of attempted indecent conduct in violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice. 1 Appellant’s sole assignment of error is that he is entitled to a corrected Entry of Judgment [EOJ] where the one contained in the record of trial fails to list the offenses for which he was convicted. The Government concedes the EOJ contained in the record of trial is incorrect and that we should correct it. We agree. Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is entitled to have court-martial records that correctly reflect the content of his proceeding. 2 In accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1111(c)(2), we modify the EOJ and direct that it be included in the record of trial. 3 After careful consideration of the record, we have determined the findings and sentence as corrected are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 4 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
1 10 U.S.C. § 880.
2 United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539, n.3 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).
3 Appellant was sentenced under the unitary sentencing scheme that was in place
prior to the Military Justice Act of 2016 taking effect. 4 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
2 UNITED STATES NMCCA NO. 202100104
v. ENTRY OF Andrew S. LANE JUDGMENT Aviation Structural Mechanic Third Class (E-4) As Modified on Appeal U.S. Navy Accused 18 October 2021
On 19 January 2021, the Accused was tried at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, by a general court-martial, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Military Judge Donald R. Ostrom presided.
FINDINGS
The following are the Accused’s pleas and the Court’s findings to all offenses the convening authority referred to trial:
Charge I: Violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 880. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Dismissed.
Specification 1: Attempted sexual abuse of a child (indecent communication) upon “Mandy,” a person he believed was under the age of 16 years, on or about 18 February 2018. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Dismissed.
Specification 2: Attempted sexual abuse of a child (indecent exposure) upon “Mandy,” a person whom he believed was under the age of 16 years, on or about 18 February 2018. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Dismissed. United States v. Lane, NMCCA No. 202100104 Modified Entry of Judgment
Specification 3: Attempted sexual abuse of a child (indecent conduct) upon “Mandy,” a person whom he believed was under the age of 16 years, on or about 18 February 2018. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Dismissed.
Specification 4: Attempted sexual abuse of a child (indecent exposure) upon “Stephanie,” a person whom he believed was under the age of 16 years, on or about 18 February 2018. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Dismissed.
Additional Charge: Violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 880. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification1: Attempted indecent conduct upon “Stephanie,” a person he believed was under the age of 16, on or about 18 February 2018. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification 2: Attempted indecent conduct upon “Mandy,” a person he believed was under the age of 16, on or about 18 February 2018. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
4 United States v. Lane, NMCCA No. 202100104 Modified Entry of Judgment
SENTENCE
On 19 January 2021, a military judge sentenced the Accused to the follow- ing: Reduction to pay grade E-1. Confinement for a total of 4 months. A bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence. 5
5 On 25 January 2021, included within the Defense’s clemency request, the trial
defense counsel asked the convening authority to suspend the sentence of confine- ment for four months, at which time, unless sooner vacated, the suspended portion would be remitted without further action. The convening authority denied this request on 24 February 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. LANE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lane-nmcca-2021.