United States v. Landreth
This text of 328 F. App'x 440 (United States v. Landreth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Barry Howard Landreth appeals from his 72-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Landreth contends that the government breached the plea agreement. We conclude that there was no plain error. See United States v. Cannel, 517 F.3d 1172, 1175-77 (9th Cir.2008); United States v. Allen, 434 F.3d 1166, 1175 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Maldonado, 215 F.3d 1046, 1051-52 (9th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-landreth-ca9-2009.