United States v. Landreth

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Landreth

164 F.2d 340, 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 255, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 3318

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 4, 1947

Docket11965

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 164 F.2d 340 (United States v. Landreth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Landreth, 164 F.2d 340, 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 255, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 3318 (5th Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves income taxes for the years 1939 and 1940. The question presented is whether certain sums received by the taxpayers from their community property constituted ordinary income or gain upon the sale of a capital asset.

After a trial upon the merits, the court below found that the enterprise contemplated by the parties, as evidenced by their contract of April 20, 1937, constituted a joint undertaking both in management and capital invested; that the legal relation created, and intended to be created, by the parties was that of partners, and the undertaking was a joint venture; that the proprietary interest of each of the parties therein was a capital asset, which had been held for more than two years, and was sold to the Phillips Petroleum Company.

The court held that these taxpayers did not merely assign future income but parted with title to the corpus of the estate from which income was expected to be produced. We agree that the transaction involved was a joint adventure and that the sale of the taxpayer’s rights was the sale of capital assets. Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532, 164 A.L.R. 1135, 90 L.Ed. 670; Reynolds v. McMurray, 10 Cir., 60 F.2d 843; Levy v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 131 F.2d 544; Graham, etc. v. Thomas, 5 Cir., 152 F.2d 564; Allen v. First National Bank, 5 Cir., 157 F.2d 592; Allen v. Beazley, 5 Cir., 157 F.2d 970. In Hort v. Commissioner, 313 U.S. 28, 61 S.Ct. 757, 85 L.Ed. 1168, the lease was cancelled, and the tenant did not get anything except a release from the contract. That case is not applicable here.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves income taxes for the years 1939 and 1940. The question presented is whether certain sums received by the taxpayers from their community property constituted ordinary income or gain upon the sale of a capital asset.

After a trial upon the merits, the court below found that the enterprise contemplated by the parties, as evidenced by their contract of April 20, 1937, constituted a joint undertaking both in management and capital invested; that the legal relation created, and intended to be created, by the parties was that of partners, and the undertaking was a joint venture; that the proprietary interest of each of the parties therein was a capital asset, which had been held for more than two years, and was sold to the Phillips Petroleum Company.

The court held that these taxpayers did not merely assign future income but parted with title to the corpus of the estate from which income was expected to be produced. We agree that the transaction involved was a joint adventure and that the sale of the taxpayer’s rights was the sale of capital assets. Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532, 164 A.L.R. 1135, 90 L.Ed. 670; Reynolds v. McMurray, 10 Cir., 60 F.2d 843; Levy v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 131 F.2d 544; Graham, etc. v. Thomas, 5 Cir., 152 F.2d 564; Allen v. First National Bank, 5 Cir., 157 F.2d 592; Allen v. Beazley, 5 Cir., 157 F.2d 970. In Hort v. Commissioner, 313 U.S. 28, 61 S.Ct. 757, 85 L.Ed. 1168, the lease was cancelled, and the tenant did not get anything except a release from the contract. That case is not applicable here.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 F.2d 340, 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 255, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 3318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-landreth-ca5-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack