United States v. Landa-Palafox
This text of 180 F. App'x 771 (United States v. Landa-Palafox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jorge Landa-Palafox appeals from the 145-month sentence imposed pursuant to his guilty-plea conviction for two counts of distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not clearly err in denying Landa-Palafox a downward adjustment for being a minor participant. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1282-83 (9th Cir.2006). Further, because Landa-Palafox had more than one criminal history point, the district court properly found him ineligible for application of the safety-valve. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1); United States v. Mulloy, 3 F.3d 1337, 1339-40 (9th Cir.1993). Finally, we conclude that the district court applied a reasonable sentence. See United States v. Plouffe, 436 F.3d 1062, 1063 (9th Cir. 2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 F. App'x 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-landa-palafox-ca9-2006.