United States v. Lance Williams

698 F. App'x 853
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 13, 2017
Docket17-1035
StatusUnpublished

This text of 698 F. App'x 853 (United States v. Lance Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lance Williams, 698 F. App'x 853 (8th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lance Williams pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of a child, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(a), (c), 1594(c), and the District Court 1 sentenced him to 120 months in prison. On appeal, in a brief filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Williams’s counsel challenges the District Court’s application of sentence enhancements under United States Sentencing Guidelines §§ 2G1.3(b)(3) and 4B1.5(b)(l), and Williams echoes the challenge to the latter enhancement in a pro se supplemental brief.

We have reviewed the evidence introduced at the sentencing hearing, which included testimony that Williams used a cellular telephone to place website advertisements soliciting persons to engage in sexual conduct with the minor and testimony that Williams facilitated several acts of prostitution involving the minor over the course of the conspiracy. We find no error in the application of either enhancement. See United States v. Kramer, 631 F.3d 900, 902 (8th Cir.) (setting forth the standard of review and applying Guidelines § 2G1.3(b)(3)), cert. denied, 563 U.S. 1039, 131 S.Ct. 2977, 180 L.Ed.2d 258 (2011); United States v. Rojas, 520 F.3d 876, 883 (8th Cir. 2008) (applying Guidelines § 4B1.5(b)). In addition, we have reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues.

We affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Kramer
631 F.3d 900 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Rojas
520 F.3d 876 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
698 F. App'x 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lance-williams-ca8-2017.