United States v. Lamb

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

United States v. Lamb

99 F. 262, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5013

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 16, 1900·No. No. 2,726·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

This is canvas woven with double warp and single filling, each of single jute yarn. The weaving appears to be plain, notwithstanding the double warp. Consequently, it appears to be a plain woven fabric of paragraph 341 of the act of 1897, as it has been assessed, rather than a manufacture of vegetable fiber, not otherwise provided for, under paragraph 347. Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEELER, District Judge.

This is canvas woven with double warp and single filling, each of single jute yarn. The weaving appears to be plain, notwithstanding the double warp. Consequently, it appears to be a plain woven fabric of paragraph 341 of the act of 1897, as it has been assessed, rather than a manufacture of vegetable fiber, not otherwise provided for, under paragraph 347. Decision affirmed.

United States v. Lamb, 99 F. 262, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5013 (circtsdny 1900).

Pincite

99 F. 262 (United States v. Lamb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related