United States v. Lamar Jabbar McGill

175 F. App'x 277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lamar Jabbar McGill. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 F. App'x 201
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 15, 2006·No. 05-14565·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John M. Tatum, appointed counsel for Lamar Jabbar McGill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and *278 McGill’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lamar Jabbar McGill, 175 F. App'x 277 (11th Cir. 2006).

175 F. App'x 277 (United States v. Lamar Jabbar McGill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)