United States v. Lagunas-OCampo
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6295
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
EDGAR ANTONIO LAGUNAS-OCAMPO,
Claimant – Appellant,
and
$2,564.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00015-F)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edgar Antonio Lagunas-OCampo, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
In this civil forfeiture case, Edgar Lagunas-OCampo
appeals the district court's judgment granting the Government’s
summary judgment motion, and forfeiting the defendant currency
to the Government. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. United States v. Lagunas-OCampo, No. 5:09-cv-00015-F
(E.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lagunas-OCampo (United States v. Lagunas-OCampo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.