United States v. Lagunas-OCampo

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2010·No. 10-6295·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6295

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

EDGAR ANTONIO LAGUNAS-OCAMPO,

Claimant – Appellant,

and

$2,564.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00015-F)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edgar Antonio Lagunas-OCampo, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

In this civil forfeiture case, Edgar Lagunas-OCampo

appeals the district court's judgment granting the Government’s

summary judgment motion, and forfeiting the defendant currency

to the Government. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

judgment. United States v. Lagunas-OCampo, No. 5:09-cv-00015-F

(E.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lagunas-OCampo, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Lagunas-OCampo (United States v. Lagunas-OCampo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.