United States v. Lagos-Murillo

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Lagos-Murillo

143 F. App'x 289

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 12, 2005

DocketNo. 05-11281; D.C. Docket No. 04-00026-CR-4-RH-WCS

StatusPublished

This text of 143 F. App'x 289 (United States v. Lagos-Murillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Lagos-Murillo, 143 F. App'x 289 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Court-appointed counsel for Ramon Odin Lagos-Murillo seeks to withdraw on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is [290]*290correct. Because independent examination reveals no arguable issues of merit on which to base an appeal, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lagos-Murillo’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Court-appointed counsel for Ramon Odin Lagos-Murillo seeks to withdraw on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is [290]*290correct. Because independent examination reveals no arguable issues of merit on which to base an appeal, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lagos-Murillo’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 F. App'x 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lagos-murillo-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack