United States v. Lagiglio

Seventh Circuit

United States v. Lagiglio

164 F. App'x 553

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided January 4, 2006·No. Nos. 03-1114, 04-1095·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Bonnie LaGiglio was sentenced for a tax offense. On appeal she argued that the district court erred by sentencing her under the formerly mandatory sentencing guidelines, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We ordered a limited remand, United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir.2005), and the district court said that it would have imposed the same sentence had it known that the guidelines were advisory. That sentence was within a properly calculated guideline range and presumptively reasonable, see United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir.2005). Because LaGiglio has not rebutted that presumption, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Bonnie LaGiglio was sentenced for a tax offense. On appeal she argued that the district court erred by sentencing her under the formerly mandatory sentencing guidelines, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We ordered a limited remand, United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir.2005), and the district court said that it would have imposed the same sentence had it known that the guidelines were advisory. That sentence was within a properly calculated guideline range and presumptively reasonable, see United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir.2005). Because LaGiglio has not rebutted that presumption, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Lagiglio, 164 F. App'x 553 (7th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

164 F. App'x 553 (United States v. Lagiglio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related