United States v. LaFoshen McAdoo

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 19, 1997·No. 97-1620·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________

No. 97-1620EA _____________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * LaFoshen McAdoo, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _____________

Submitted: June 5, 1997 Filed: June 19, 1997 _____________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _____________

PER CURIAM.

In appealing his guidelines sentence, LaFoshen McAdoo's attack on the constitutionality of the crack cocaine sentencing ratio borders on the frivolous. We have consistently rejected this argument. See United States v. Johnson, 108 F.3d 919, 922 (8th Cir. 1997). We affirm McAdoo's sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. LaFoshen McAdoo, (8th Cir. 1997).

United States v. LaFoshen McAdoo (United States v. LaFoshen McAdoo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Reginald Johnson
108 F.3d 919 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)