United States v. LaFirst

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. LaFirst

18 C.M.A. 66, 18 USCMA 66, 39 C.M.R. 66, 1968 CMA LEXIS 185, 1968 WL 5062

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedDecember 13, 1968

DocketNo. 21,306

StatusPublished

This text of 18 C.M.A. 66 (United States v. LaFirst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. LaFirst, 18 C.M.A. 66, 18 USCMA 66, 39 C.M.R. 66, 1968 CMA LEXIS 185, 1968 WL 5062 (cma 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Although the documentation as to the circmstances surrounding the composition and organization of the special court-martial that tried this accused is not as complete as that in United States v McLaughlin, 18 USCMA 61, 39 CMR 61, there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the convening authority exercised the same sort of control over this court as he did over the court-martial in McLaughlin. For the reasons set out in our opinion in that case, we reverse the decision of the board of review here. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside, and the Charge is ordered dismissed.

Judge Darden did not participate in the decision in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Although the documentation as to the circmstances surrounding the composition and organization of the special court-martial that tried this accused is not as complete as that in United States v McLaughlin, 18 USCMA 61, 39 CMR 61, there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the convening authority exercised the same sort of control over this court as he did over the court-martial in McLaughlin. For the reasons set out in our opinion in that case, we reverse the decision of the board of review here. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside, and the Charge is ordered dismissed.

Judge Darden did not participate in the decision in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 C.M.A. 66, 18 USCMA 66, 39 C.M.R. 66, 1968 CMA LEXIS 185, 1968 WL 5062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lafirst-cma-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack