United States v. Ladwig
This text of United States v. Ladwig (United States v. Ladwig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 04-30393 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-03-00232-RHW CRAIG ALLEN LADWIG, Eastern District Defendant-Appellant. of Washington, Spokane
ORDER
Filed January 27, 2006
Before: Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,* District Judge.
ORDER
In our opinion of December 27, 2005, we retained jurisdic- tion and directed the parties to provide supplemental briefing on whether either wished to pursue a limited remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). Because both parties have responded that they do not seek an Ameline remand, and other sentencing issues were resolved in our prior opinion, we now AFFIRM Ladwig’s sentence, and direct the Clerk to issue the mandate after the time for filing a Petition for Rehearing or Petition for Rehear- ing En Banc has expired.
*The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
1179 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ladwig, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ladwig-ca9-2006.