United States v. Lacour

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 25, 2001
Docket01-30456
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Lacour (United States v. Lacour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lacour, (5th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30456 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN LACOUR,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CR-10012-3 -------------------- October 25, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Lacour, federal prisoner # 09668-035, appeals the

district court’s denial of his postconviction motion to rescind

the imposition of a $40,000 fine. Lacour challenged the fine on

direct appeal, and we affirmed the district court. See United

States v. Lacour, No. 98-30803 (5th Cir. Apr. 11, 2000)

(unpublished). Lacour, however, again argues that imposition of

a fine was a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights because of

his inability to pay.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-30456 -2-

The district court was without jurisdiction to entertain

this unauthorized motion. See United States v. Hatten, 167 F.3d

884, 886 (5th Cir. 1999) (district court has no jurisdiction to

entertain a challenge to the legality of a fine imposed as a term

of supervised release); see also United States v. Early, 27 F.3d

140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994) (district court has no jurisdiction

to entertain unauthorized motions). This appeal is without

arguable merit and therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). It is dismissed. 5th Cir.

R. 42.2.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hatten
167 F.3d 884 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Howard v. King
707 F.2d 215 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Darrell Early
27 F.3d 140 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Lacour, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lacour-ca5-2001.