United States v. Lach

7 C.M.A. 305, 7 USCMA 305, 22 C.M.R. 95, 1956 CMA LEXIS 214, 1956 WL 4742
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedAugust 24, 1956
DocketNo. 8086
StatusPublished

This text of 7 C.M.A. 305 (United States v. Lach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lach, 7 C.M.A. 305, 7 USCMA 305, 22 C.M.R. 95, 1956 CMA LEXIS 214, 1956 WL 4742 (cma 1956).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

Among the issues in this ease is one similar to that presented in United States v Hawthorne, 7 USCMA 293, 22 CMR 83. For the reasons set out in that opinion, the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for transmittal to the officer exercising summary court-martial jurisdiction over the accused for his consideration and action.

Judge FERGUSON concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hawthorne
7 C.M.A. 293 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 C.M.A. 305, 7 USCMA 305, 22 C.M.R. 95, 1956 CMA LEXIS 214, 1956 WL 4742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lach-cma-1956.