United States v. LaBarba
This text of United States v. LaBarba (United States v. LaBarba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-30003 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES G. “JERRY” LABARBA, SR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-50103-1 -------------------- October 1, 2001
Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
James G. “Jerry” LaBarba, Sr., appeals his jury convictions
for conspiring to commit bank fraud and to misapply bank funds
and aiding and abetting bank fraud. He argues that the district
court erred in excluding proffered evidence of a work-out
agreement between him and the defrauded bank. After reviewing
the record and the briefs of the parties, we hold that the
district court did not abuse its broad discretion in excluding
the evidence as being irrelevant to LaBarba’s intent and, in any
event, did not abuse its discretion in excluding the evidence
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-30003 -2-
under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. See United States v.
Waldrip, 981 F.2d 799, 806 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v.
Tidwell, 559 F.2d 262, 265-67 (5th Cir. 1977).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. LaBarba, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-labarba-ca5-2001.