United States v. La Fetra

Second Circuit

United States v. La Fetra

178 F. 1006, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4596

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 7, 1910

DocketNo. 149 (5,287)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 F. 1006 (United States v. La Fetra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. La Fetra, 178 F. 1006, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4596 (2d Cir. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

If this were a case of novel impression, more weight might be given to the argument advanced by the government in support of its contention as to the meaning of the words “single strand.” But the question has been several times before the courts, and it appears from examination of - the samples X and Y that goods- identically like the present importations were before this court when the decision of the Circuit Court in Trefousse v. United States, 144 Fed. 708, was affirmed several years ago. 154 Fed. 1005, 83 C. C. A. 679. A great deal of testimony has been taken in this case as to commercial designation, but it is so conflicting that we agree with the Board and the Circuit Court in the conclusion that it is impossible to deduce therefrom any semblance of uniformity. There is certainly not enough in it to warrant the reversal of the earlier decisions. Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

If this were a case of novel impression, more weight might be given to the argument advanced by the government in support of its contention as to the meaning of the words “single strand.” But the question has been several times before the courts, and it appears from examination of - the samples X and Y that goods- identically like the present importations were before this court when the decision of the Circuit Court in Trefousse v. United States, 144 Fed. 708, was affirmed several years ago. 154 Fed. 1005, 83 C. C. A. 679. A great deal of testimony has been taken in this case as to commercial designation, but it is so conflicting that we agree with the Board and the Circuit Court in the conclusion that it is impossible to deduce therefrom any semblance of uniformity. There is certainly not enough in it to warrant the reversal of the earlier decisions. Decision affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 F. 1006, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-la-fetra-ca2-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack