United States v. L. Dale Rohl

Ninth Circuit

United States v. L. Dale Rohl

588 F.2d 296

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 15, 1978

Docket78-2837

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 588 F.2d 296 (United States v. L. Dale Rohl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. L. Dale Rohl, 588 F.2d 296 (9th Cir. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon due consideration of appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel, Norman Sepenuk, Esq., will be appointed counsel by a separate order. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(c). Appellant is therefore entitled to obtain a transcript of the record on appeal prepared at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).

Counsel Sepenuk’s request to associate with James Coon, Esq., on this appeal is granted. However, total compensation for all counsel shall not exceed the amount payable if only one attorney had been appointed. Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Senate Comm, on the Judiciary, 90th Cong., 2d Sess., The Criminal Justice Act in the Federal District Courts 189-90 (Comm. Print 1969).

Appellant and counsel are advised that there is a continuing obligation to inform this court of any changes in appellant’s financial status. 9th Cir. R. Appendix § 8(a).

Counsel is granted a 45-day extension of time in which to file an opening brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon due consideration of appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel, Norman Sepenuk, Esq., will be appointed counsel by a separate order. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(c). Appellant is therefore entitled to obtain a transcript of the record on appeal prepared at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).

Counsel Sepenuk’s request to associate with James Coon, Esq., on this appeal is granted. However, total compensation for all counsel shall not exceed the amount payable if only one attorney had been appointed. Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Senate Comm, on the Judiciary, 90th Cong., 2d Sess., The Criminal Justice Act in the Federal District Courts 189-90 (Comm. Print 1969).

Appellant and counsel are advised that there is a continuing obligation to inform this court of any changes in appellant’s financial status. 9th Cir. R. Appendix § 8(a).

Counsel is granted a 45-day extension of time in which to file an opening brief.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

588 F.2d 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-l-dale-rohl-ca9-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack