United States v. Kwong Man-Fai, A/K/A Simon Kwong

920 F.2d 1039, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22404
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 1990
Docket90-3039
StatusUnpublished

This text of 920 F.2d 1039 (United States v. Kwong Man-Fai, A/K/A Simon Kwong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kwong Man-Fai, A/K/A Simon Kwong, 920 F.2d 1039, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22404 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Opinion

920 F.2d 1039

287 U.S.App.D.C. 245

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
KWONG MAN-FAI, a/k/a Simon Kwong, Appellant.

Nos. 89-3106, 89-3108 and 90-3039.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1990.

Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.R. 14(c). For the reasons set forth in the memorandum accompanying Ng Wah v. United States (No. 89-3117 and No. 90-3146), it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by the Court that the District Court's orders of June 15, 1989, denying appellant's pre-sentence motion to withdraw guilty plea, and January 11, 1990, denying appellant's post-sentencing motion to withdraw guilty plea pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255, be affirmed.

It is FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that the Clerk shall withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.R. 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ruffin (Kevin E.)
920 F.2d 1039 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 F.2d 1039, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kwong-man-fai-aka-simon-kwong-cadc-1990.