United States v. Kwane Wheat

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 2022
Docket21-2531
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Kwane Wheat (United States v. Kwane Wheat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kwane Wheat, (8th Cir. 2022).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 21-2531 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Kwane Demarchel Wheat

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Central ____________

Submitted: March 7, 2022 Filed: March 10, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Kwane Wheat appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to firearm offenses. On appeal, Wheat argues that the district court erred in determining that one of his prior convictions constituted a crime of violence.

1 The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. Upon careful review, we find that the district court did not err in finding that Wheat’s conviction under Iowa Code § 708.2(1) was a crime of violence. See United States v. Craig, 630 F.3d 717, 723 (8th Cir. 2011) (district court’s finding that a prior conviction constitutes a crime of violence under the Sentencing Guidelines is reviewed de novo); see also United States v. Quigley, 943 F.3d 390, 395 (8th Cir. 2019) (conviction under § 708.2(1) qualifies as a crime of violence under the Guidelines; mere speculation that § 702.2(1) could be applied to conduct not involving physical force does not take the offense outside the scope of the force clause; “we can think of no non-fanciful, non-theoretical manner in which to commit such crime without at least threatening use of physical force”).

Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Craig
630 F.3d 717 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Bradd Quigley
943 F.3d 390 (Eighth Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Kwane Wheat, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kwane-wheat-ca8-2022.