United States v. Kusnierz

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Kusnierz

33 F.2d 887, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2845

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 1, 1929

DocketNo. 5747

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 F.2d 887 (United States v. Kusnierz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Kusnierz, 33 F.2d 887, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2845 (9th Cir. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

In its controlling substantive facts and the proceedings taken in the court below this ease is analogous to United States v. Buzard (No. 5727) 33 F.(2d) 883, this day decided, and for the purposes of the present appeal must be deemed to be ruled thereby. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, with directions to take further proceedings not out of harmony with the principles and conclusions stated in the opinion in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

In its controlling substantive facts and the proceedings taken in the court below this ease is analogous to United States v. Buzard (No. 5727) 33 F.(2d) 883, this day decided, and for the purposes of the present appeal must be deemed to be ruled thereby. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, with directions to take further proceedings not out of harmony with the principles and conclusions stated in the opinion in that case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 F.2d 887, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kusnierz-ca9-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack