United States v. Kusnierz

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Kusnierz

33 F.2d 887, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2845

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 1, 1929·No. No. 5747·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

In its controlling substantive facts and the proceedings taken in the court below this ease is analogous to United States v. Buzard (No. 5727) 33 F.(2d) 883, this day decided, and for the purposes of the present appeal must be deemed to be ruled thereby. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, with directions to take further proceedings not out of harmony with the principles and conclusions stated in the opinion in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

In its controlling substantive facts and the proceedings taken in the court below this ease is analogous to United States v. Buzard (No. 5727) 33 F.(2d) 883, this day decided, and for the purposes of the present appeal must be deemed to be ruled thereby. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, with directions to take further proceedings not out of harmony with the principles and conclusions stated in the opinion in that case.

United States v. Kusnierz, 33 F.2d 887, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2845 (9th Cir. 1929).

Pincite

33 F.2d 887 (United States v. Kusnierz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related