United States v. Kurtz
26 F. Cas. 825, 4 D.C. 674, 4 Cranch 674
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 15, 1836
StatusPublished
This text of 26 F. Cas. 825 (United States v. Kurtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Kurtz, 26 F. Cas. 825, 4 D.C. 674, 4 Cranch 674 (circtddc 1836).
Opinion
was of opinion that the description of the things stolen was too vague, and quashed the indictment. A new indictment was found by the grand jury. [Post, 682.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 F. Cas. 825, 4 D.C. 674, 4 Cranch 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kurtz-circtddc-1836.