United States v. Kurt Orban Co.

40 Cust. Ct. 784
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Kurt Orban Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 44 Cust. Ct. 759
United States Customs Court·Decided April 9, 1958·No. Reap. Dec. 9120; Entry No. 79-C·Published

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain steel reinforcing bars exported from Paris, France, and entered at Corpus Christi, Tex.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case is before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of these steel reinforcing bars is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value, which I hold to be the proper value, for each of the sizes of the steel reinforcing bars in question; is as follows:

Size Price
_$92.00 per metric ton base price, plus $1.00 for intemédiate grade, plus $2.90.
y¡"_$92.00 per metric ton base price, plus $1.00 for intermediate grade, plus $1.45.
Both sizes packed, less inland freight as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kurt Orban Co., 40 Cust. Ct. 784 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 784 (United States v. Kurt Orban Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.