United States v. Kuhl

16 C.M.A. 193, 16 USCMA 193, 36 C.M.R. 349, 1966 CMA LEXIS 274, 1966 WL 4480
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedApril 8, 1966
DocketNo. 19,193
StatusPublished

This text of 16 C.M.A. 193 (United States v. Kuhl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kuhl, 16 C.M.A. 193, 16 USCMA 193, 36 C.M.R. 349, 1966 CMA LEXIS 274, 1966 WL 4480 (cma 1966).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

This case was tried in common with United States v Kugima, 16 USCMA 183, 36 CMR 339, this day decided, and involves the identical issue whether the general court-martial appointed by the Chief of Staff, Third Marine Division, then acting as the Commanding Officer of that organization, was duly constituted. For the reasons set forth in the Kugima case, supra, we find that authority to appoint the general court-martial was present.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Kugima
16 C.M.A. 183 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 C.M.A. 193, 16 USCMA 193, 36 C.M.R. 349, 1966 CMA LEXIS 274, 1966 WL 4480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kuhl-cma-1966.