United States v. Krohn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7475

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH BRUCE KROHN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:77-cr-00162-LO-1)

Submitted: June 30, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Bruce Krohn, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Walters, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Bruce Krohn appeals the district court’s

orders denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis and

denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

United States v. Krohn, No. 1:77-cr-00162-LO-1 (E.D. Va. filed &

entered Apr. 7, 2008; filed June 9, 2008 & entered June 10,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED