United States v. Kristopher Brock
Opinion
Case: 19-20786 Document: 00515430322 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/27/2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
No. 19-20786
Fifth Circuit
FILED
Summary Calendar May 27, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
KRISTOPHER BROCK,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-364-1
Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kristopher Brock is serving a 360-month sentence imposed in 2004 following his guilty plea to two counts of possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of cocaine base. He moved for resentencing under the First Step Act of 2018 (FSA), § 404, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (2018). The district court denied the motion; however, the reason for the district court’s denial is not apparent from the record. We thus REMAND for the limited
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-20786 Document: 00515430322 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/27/2020
No. 19-20786
purpose of allowing the district court to explain why it denied Brock’s motion, and we retain jurisdiction as is customary for limited remands. See United States v. Jackson, 945 F.3d 315, 318 (5th Cir. 2019) (affirming after a limited remand for the district court to provide reasons for the denial of the defendant’s FSA motion), cert. denied, No. 19-8036, 2020 WL 1906710 (U.S. Apr. 20, 2020); see, e.g., United States v. Gomez, 905 F.3d 347, 354-56 (5th Cir. 2018).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Kristopher Brock (United States v. Kristopher Brock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.