United States v. Krautheim

10 M.J. 763, 1981 CMR LEXIS 815
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review·Decided February 6, 1981·No. NCM 80 2887·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error and the Government’s reply thereto and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed. The court-martial was held in Japan; the pretrial agreement in this case waived the personal appearance of character witnesses located outside the limits of Japan in return for a limitation on the sentence. We do not find such a provision void as against public policy. See United States v. Hanna, 4 M.J. 938, 940 (N.C.M.R. 1978) (dictum). Accordingly, the findings and sentence as approved on review below are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Krautheim, 10 M.J. 763, 1981 CMR LEXIS 815 (usnmcmilrev 1981).

10 M.J. 763 (United States v. Krautheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Callaway
21 M.J. 740 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1986)
United States v. Sharper
17 M.J. 803 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1984)