United States v. Kpakima

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: December 27, 2010
• Docket: Criminal No. 2009-0038
• Status: Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRIC'I` OF COLUMBIA F I L E D

DEC 2 7 2010 UN!TED STATES OF AMERICA, ) cl k U Plain¢iff, ) cutir'zé rdrsin[§i§:iri§&¢g:a'r';'§'¢'i'rliiia ) v. ) ) Criminal No. 09-00038-001 (JDB/AK) KENNETH KPAKIMA, ) Defendant. ) )

Fe@sam/t/ CONSENT T0 MODIFY SU

The Defendant,between June 2010 and the date he appeared before the undersigned on fo/?ot§)‘}`r/z>)v December 16, ZOIO,accumuIated nine (9) technical violations of his and an arrest for Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle, which is currently pending in D.C. Superior Court. . _ . _ .. . P/?<>@/)W<>~

Prior to the violations, Mr. Kpakima was in compliance with the conditions of his super-nason and attending a training program At the hearing before the undersigned, the Defendant conceded the technical violations, The Probation Officer recommended that the Defendant be sanctioned for the acknowledged technical violations to a six month placement in a Residential Re-Entry/Sanction Center and the subsistence costs waived. Both the Defendant and the United States, without objection, agreed that the recommendation of the Probation Oftice was an appropriate sanction and that Mr. Kapkima be permitted to self surrender. Accordingly it is recommended that the Defendant’s conditions of release be modified as follows: That the Defendant be placed in a Residential Re-entry /Sanction Center for a period of six months and

the subsistence costs be waived.

DATED§¢¢,,,§,,, \;{ , 2010 6 z 1 /"\ ALA‘N loew / UNITED s s MAGISTRATE JuDGE

Failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendations set forth in this

report may waive your right of appeal from an order of the District Court adopting such findings and recommendations. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). The Magistrate Judge having recommended that the conditions of Defendant’s s\,i-per=v-ised_ &0'39>70/`/ ~i=elease~be modified and there being no objection thereto, lT IS ORDERED that the

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted.

DATED;~@-<-~\>w 23 ,2010 M/`

UNITED@TATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE