United States v. Korteland
This text of United States v. Korteland (United States v. Korteland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 23-50752 Document: 57-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 23-50752 July 11, 2024 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Timothy Rey Korteland,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-621-1 ______________________________
Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Timothy Rey Korteland pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography, and the district court sentenced him within the guidelines range to 78 months of imprisonment, followed by 15 years of supervised release. On appeal, he contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court (1) did not account for his history and
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-50752 Document: 57-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2024
No. 23-50752
characteristics and (2) clearly erred in balancing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Here, the district court considered Korteland’s mitigating evidence at the sentencing hearing regarding his autism diagnosis and explained why it was unpersuaded that Korteland’s diagnosis warranted a downward variance. Specifically, the nature and circumstances of the offense gave the court “grave concern.” Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in balancing the § 3553(a) factors, and we reject Korteland’s contention that the district court failed to account for his history and characteristics. See United States v. Jenkins, 712 F.3d 209, 214-15 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Cooks, 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009). AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Korteland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-korteland-ca5-2024.