United States v. Kontos
This text of 156 F. App'x 932 (United States v. Kontos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Anthony Kontos appeals the 140-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea conviction for illegal possession of a listed [933]*933chemical in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2), 802(33) and (34)(K).
We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Smith, 389 F.3d 944, 953 (9th Cir.2004) (appeal waiver is valid if language of waiver encompasses the right to appeal on the grounds claimed on appeal, and waiver is knowingly and voluntarily made); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 F. App'x 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kontos-ca9-2005.