United States v. Konitski

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 7, 1996·No. 95-20388·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20388

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT LESLIE KONITSKI, a/k/a Robert Maxwell Black,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. J-95-CR-15-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Robert Leslie Konitski contends that the district court erred in imposing a fine. The district court was not clearly erroneous in its finding that Konitski had the potential ability to pay the fine in the future and did not abuse its discretion in imposing the fine. United States v. Fair, 979 F.2d 1037, 1040-42 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Altamirano, 11 F.3d 52, 53 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Konitski, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Konitski (United States v. Konitski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Marion Eugene Fair
979 F.2d 1037 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Michael Ray Altamirano
11 F.3d 52 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)