United States v. Konigsberg
This text of 354 F.2d 1007 (United States v. Konigsberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have examined carefully each point raised by the defendants-appellants and the testimony given before the grand jury by Zavod and Kaplan has been read and weighed in the light of the record of the trial. See United States v. Boyance, 329 F.2d 372 (3 Cir. 1964) and United States v. Bertucci, 333 F.2d 292 (3 Cir. 1964). We find no error in the proceedings in the court below. Consequently the judgments of conviction will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
354 F.2d 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-konigsberg-ca3-1966.