United States v. Konigsberg

Third Circuit

United States v. Konigsberg

354 F.2d 1007

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Konigsberg. Read the opinion of the Court — 336 F.2d 844 →

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 27, 1966·No. Nos. 15224, 15225·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined carefully each point raised by the defendants-appellants and the testimony given before the grand jury by Zavod and Kaplan has been read and weighed in the light of the record of the trial. See United States v. Boyance, 329 F.2d 372 (3 Cir. 1964) and United States v. Bertucci, 333 F.2d 292 (3 Cir. 1964). We find no error in the proceedings in the court below. Consequently the judgments of conviction will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined carefully each point raised by the defendants-appellants and the testimony given before the grand jury by Zavod and Kaplan has been read and weighed in the light of the record of the trial. See United States v. Boyance, 329 F.2d 372 (3 Cir. 1964) and United States v. Bertucci, 333 F.2d 292 (3 Cir. 1964). We find no error in the proceedings in the court below. Consequently the judgments of conviction will be affirmed.

United States v. Konigsberg, 354 F.2d 1007 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

354 F.2d 1007 (United States v. Konigsberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related