United States v. Konigsberg

354 F.2d 1007
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 1966
DocketNos. 15224, 15225
StatusPublished

This text of 354 F.2d 1007 (United States v. Konigsberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Konigsberg, 354 F.2d 1007 (3d Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined carefully each point raised by the defendants-appellants and the testimony given before the grand jury by Zavod and Kaplan has been read and weighed in the light of the record of the trial. See United States v. Boyance, 329 F.2d 372 (3 Cir. 1964) and United States v. Bertucci, 333 F.2d 292 (3 Cir. 1964). We find no error in the proceedings in the court below. Consequently the judgments of conviction will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bertucci
333 F.2d 292 (Third Circuit, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
354 F.2d 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-konigsberg-ca3-1966.