United States v. Knight

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided September 17, 2010·No. Criminal No. 2001-0016·Published

Opinion

CONSENT FOR |V|OD|F|CAT|ON OF SUPERV|SED RELEASE/PROBAT|ON

Uf\nTED STATEs DISTRICT CouRT

roche F I L E D

District of`Columbia

SEP 1 7 2010 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of columbia UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ` _ , 01-cR-00016-01 VS- ) Criminal No. Nle|vin T. Knight § Defendant )

CONSENT 'I`O MODIFY PROBATlON/SUPERVISED RELEASE

The parties agree the defendant's conditions of supervised release/probation should be modified and being no objection thereto, lT lS RECOl\/ll\/IENDED THAT the defendant's conditions of supervised release/probation are modified as follows: (state modification, e.g. that he spend 60 days of his term in an inpatient treatment facility).

Complete 20 hours of community service

Dated: "lq"`_§"‘* Q`Y¢”zm° &7

U.S( l\/Iagistrate

Failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendations set forth in this port may waive your right of appeal fro1n an order ofthe District Court adopting such findings and recommendations. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

The magistratejudge having recommended that the conditions of the defendant's supervised release/probation be modified and there being no objection thereto. lT lS ORDERED that the recommendation ofthe magistratejudge is accepted.

Dated: ? {?'//`° U.S. District judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Knight, (D.D.C. 2010).

United States v. Knight (United States v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)