United States v. Knight

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Knight

22 C.M.A. 345

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedJune 8, 1973

DocketNo. 26,565

StatusPublished

This text of 22 C.M.A. 345 (United States v. Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Knight, 22 C.M.A. 345 (cma 1973).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion

Quinn, Judge:

Convicted of two lengthy periods of unauthorized absence, the accused testified that he was unable to adjust to life in the Marine Corps. On this appeal, he contends that evidence of a previous conviction by summary court-martial was improperly admitted because at the trial he had been unrepresented by counsel. Unlike the situation in United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (May 25, 1973), this record of trial demonstrates that the evidence of the previous conviction had no prejudicial effect. The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Quinn, Judge:

Convicted of two lengthy periods of unauthorized absence, the accused testified that he was unable to adjust to life in the Marine Corps. On this appeal, he contends that evidence of a previous conviction by summary court-martial was improperly admitted because at the trial he had been unrepresented by counsel. Unlike the situation in United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (May 25, 1973), this record of trial demonstrates that the evidence of the previous conviction had no prejudicial effect. The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 C.M.A. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-knight-cma-1973.