United States v. Klaes
453 F.2d 1375
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 4, 1972·No. No. 71-2765·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Klaes’ sole contention is that only hearsay evidence was presented to the grand jury, and therefore the indictment should have been dismissed. This contention is without merit. See Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 76 S.Ct. 406, 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); United States v. Gower, 447 F.2d 187 (5th Cir. 1971). The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Klaes, 453 F.2d 1375 (5th Cir. 1972).
453 F.2d 1375 (United States v. Klaes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. George F. Brown
574 F.2d 1274 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Steven Paul Newcomb Anod Wayne E. Lucas, Jr.
488 F.2d 190 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Nelson Cruz
478 F.2d 408 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. George Curtis Bird
456 F.2d 1023 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)