United States v. Klaes
453 F.2d 1375
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 1972
DocketNo. 71-2765
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 453 F.2d 1375 (United States v. Klaes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Klaes, 453 F.2d 1375 (5th Cir. 1972).
Opinion
Klaes’ sole contention is that only hearsay evidence was presented to the grand jury, and therefore the indictment should have been dismissed. This contention is without merit. See Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 76 S.Ct. 406, 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); United States v. Gower, 447 F.2d 187 (5th Cir. 1971). The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. George F. Brown
574 F.2d 1274 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Steven Paul Newcomb Anod Wayne E. Lucas, Jr.
488 F.2d 190 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Nelson Cruz
478 F.2d 408 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. George Curtis Bird
456 F.2d 1023 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
453 F.2d 1375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-klaes-ca5-1972.