United States v. Kizzee
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kedrin Kizzee appeals from the 288-month sentence imposed following his jury conviction for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and possession with intent to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Kizzee’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. This court gave appellant an opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
285 F. App'x 352 (United States v. Kizzee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.