United States v. Kit King

44 F. App'x 46
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 15, 2002
Docket01-3509
StatusUnpublished

This text of 44 F. App'x 46 (United States v. Kit King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kit King, 44 F. App'x 46 (8th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kit A. King appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Mr. King argues, as he did below, that there was no probable cause to stop the car in which he was a passenger. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude, for the reasons explained by the district court, that the officer in question had probable cause under the totality of the circumstances to believe that the driver of the car had committed a traffic violation. See United States v. Snook, 88 F.3d 605, 607 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Kathleen A. Jaudzemis, United States Magistrate Judge for the District Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wayne Steven Snook
88 F.3d 605 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 F. App'x 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kit-king-ca8-2002.