United States v. Kirkpatrick

104 F. App'x 438
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 2004
Docket04-40264
StatusUnpublished

This text of 104 F. App'x 438 (United States v. Kirkpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kirkpatrick, 104 F. App'x 438 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Travis Eugene Kirkpatrick appeals following his guilty-plea conviction of aiding and abetting possession of a counterfeited security with intent to deceive another person or organization. He argues that the district court erroneously calculated his sentence because he should have been held accountable only for the six checks that he cashed and the victims involved, rather than for all of the organization’s intended loss occurring after he joined it and for the victims of that loss.

The district court could fairly infer a joint undertaking whose scope encompassed the check-cashing activities of the other members of the organization from the fact that Kirkpatrick participated with the other members in selecting the cities and stores in which to cash the checks and the fact that he coordinated his check cashing with the other members. See United States v. Evbuomwan, 992 F.2d 70, 74 (5th Cir.1993); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3, comment. (n.2). The cashing of checks by the other members of the organization was both in furtherance of the organization’s jointly undertaken criminal activity and reasonably foreseeable in connection with it. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3, comment, (n.2).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Joe Evbuomwan
992 F.2d 70 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 F. App'x 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kirkpatrick-ca5-2004.