United States v. Kirk Ward

549 F. App'x 586
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 26, 2013
Docket13-1423
StatusUnpublished

This text of 549 F. App'x 586 (United States v. Kirk Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kirk Ward, 549 F. App'x 586 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kirk Ward pleaded guilty to felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), preserving his right to appeal the district court’s 1 adverse disposition of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. The district court imposed a term of three years’ probation. Ward appeals. Having carefully reviewed the record, the well-reasoned opinion of the magistrate judge, which was adopted by the district court, and the briefs filed on appeal in this court, we find no basis for reversal. See United States v. Esquivias, 416 F.3d 696, 699 (8th Cir.2005) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Sarah W. Hays, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hector Esquivias
416 F.3d 696 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
549 F. App'x 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kirk-ward-ca8-2013.