United States v. Kirk Turner

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 2000
Docket99-3519
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Kirk Turner (United States v. Kirk Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kirk Turner, (8th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 99-3519 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Kirk Brian Turner, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: April 11, 2000

Filed: April 19, 2000 ___________

Before McMILLIAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and ROSENBAUM,* District Judge. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Kirk Brian Turner pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced Turner as a career offender under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) § 4B1.1, which applies when the defendant has "at least two prior felony convictions of . . . a crime of violence," id. § 4B1.1(3), because the court concluded Turner's California conviction for shooting at

* The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. an inhabited dwelling was a crime of violence within the meaning of § 4B1.1. Turner appeals his sentence, challenging this conclusion.

Section 4B1.2(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines defines a "crime of violence" for the purposes of § 4B1.1 as "any offense under federal or state law . . . that has as an element the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, or . . . otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious risk of physical injury to another." Id. § 4B1.2(a). Turner contends his California offense was just a crime against property rather than a crime of violence as defined in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a). We disagree.

In 1994, Turner was convicted of violating § 246 of the California Penal Code, which provided: "Any person who shall maliciously and willfully discharge a firearm at an inhabited dwelling . . . is guilty of felony . . . . As used in this section, 'inhabited' means currently being used for dwelling purposes, whether occupied or not." The conviction resulted from Turner's discharge of a gun in a house occupied by Turner's girlfriend following an angry confrontation with her. We agree with the district court that Turner's conviction was for a crime of violence within the meaning of § 4B1.1. See United States v. Weinert, 1 F.3d 889, 891 (9th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (shooting at an inhabited dwelling in violation of Cal. Penal Code § 246 is a crime of violence within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1). We thus affirm Turner's sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robert William Weinert
1 F.3d 889 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Kirk Turner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kirk-turner-ca8-2000.