United States v. Kinsinger

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Kinsinger

56 F. App'x 173

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2003·No. No. 02-2120·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Simon Kinsinger appeals from the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to enforce an IRS summons. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kinsinger, No. MISC-02-3-5 (W.D.Va. Sept. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Simon Kinsinger appeals from the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to enforce an IRS summons. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kinsinger, No. MISC-02-3-5 (W.D.Va. Sept. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Kinsinger, 56 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

56 F. App'x 173 (United States v. Kinsinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related